found this presentation on Jython which mentions jylluminate, a thing I was looking for for a long time now. Quite often I try some java library to test and check how it works or how to do something with it in Jython, so much more convinient than actually using Java itself.
BTW, a colleaque insists Eclipse does all he wants so he will even be quicker (regarding typing) with it compared to my Jython but of course less typing alone is not everything Jython makes a better Java or even bearable…
Even he admitted conversion of arrays to lists and back with all the casting and even for a java programmer unusual syntax is at best awkward.
I guess quite a few programmers in the java world give up on certain libraries and work a way around the original problem as I just experienced with a simple problem in DOM4J which took only a few lines in Jython (or even better the jyconsole (forgot the link…)) which is really great to work with.
Maybe just my experience but I saw it a few times and wonder if that might be a general thing.
Actually now after using Python and its really good docs make the Javadocs of e.g. the JSEE look a bit shabby. Javadoc and of course the whole standard library is just huge with loads of classes. Python on the other hand almost always seems to have same functionality but with a much simpler API. Now I jump from x to y I know but that’s almost anagolous to DOM4J’s huge API compared to XOM‘s tiny, easy and well thought through API (which is expected from Elliotte Rusty Harold of course). So a nice API in Java is possible but does not seem as ubiquitous as in Python (which of course has bad examples too).